What Coaches/Mentors Can Learn from The Second Mountain
Coach Ridley had built the best win-loss record in the league's history and a wall of trophies that made recruiters nervous. At a reunion dinner, though, it wasn't the championships his former players toasted. One after another stood up to describe a hard conversation at nineteen, a note sent after they'd been cut, a time he'd shown up for something that had nothing to do with the sport. Ridley sat there realizing the record he was proudest of wasn't the one in the program. He'd spent decades chasing wins while the thing people actually remembered had been happening quietly all along, unmeasured. What had he actually been coaching for?
The whole book, compressed
This edition works through 4 core lessons — take them one at a time, not all at once.
What's different for your conditions
Tap whichever ones sound like you. Nothing here is sent or saved — it's just for your own noticing.
0 of 5 selected
The core lessons, applied to you
The scoreboard that isn't the real record
Wins and championships are genuine first-mountain achievements, and David Brooks wouldn't ask a coach to stop caring about them. But if the scoreboard is the only record kept, the actual formation happening in players goes unnoticed, left to chance rather than treated as the point. Coaches who notice this early can start keeping a second, private record alongside the public one, tracking who they helped become, not just what they helped win.
Results still matter for job security and a program's survival, and idealism doesn't pay salaries or fill rosters.
After this season, write down one thing a player or mentee became, not achieved, that you're proudest of.
Coaching as calling, not just competition
A coaching or mentoring role becomes a vocation, in Brooks's sense, when the coach is oriented toward a person's whole development, not only their performance in the specific skill taught. That reframe changes what gets said after a loss, what gets prioritized in practice, and whether a struggling player gets written off or invested in further. It requires more emotional labor than pure technical coaching, but it's the difference players actually remember decades later.
Over-investing personally in every mentee's whole life can blur boundaries a coach needs to sustain the role long-term.
This week, ask one mentee a question about their life that has nothing to do with performance, and actually listen.
Staying present past the easy seasons
Brooks's argument that depth comes from sustained commitment applies directly to mentorship: the mentee who's struggling or seemingly ungrateful often needs continued presence most, not a reason to withdraw toward easier, more rewarding relationships. Real mentorship, like marriage in Brooks's framing, is proven in the hard stretch, not the easy one.
Some mentee relationships are genuinely unhealthy or one-sided, and continued investment can become self-sacrifice without benefit.
Identify the mentee you've been quietly avoiding and reach out once this week with no agenda beyond checking in.
The framework a mentor passes on
Every coach and mentor transmits some underlying philosophy of what a person is for, through explicit words or the daily example of how pressure and failure get handled, and that framework can come from religious faith, secular ethics, or a personally built philosophy of character. David Brooks describes his own grounding in Christian faith, while framing it as his particular path, not the only legitimate one. What mentees actually absorb is whatever the mentor genuinely lives, religious or not.
Vocation and relational depth compete for coaches in a specific way: the drive to win, part of what makes coaching feel purposeful, can crowd out the slower work of knowing each player as a person. Brooks wouldn't ask a coach to abandon competitiveness; he'd ask that winning not become the only thing worth real time. Holding both means treating individual relationships as part of the win, not a distraction from it.
Name one thing, honestly
- What is the private record of who you helped become, separate from your public win-loss record? - Which mentee have you quietly written off, and what would re-engaging cost you? - What philosophy are your players or mentees actually absorbing from how you handle pressure?
Good. Now look back at the "Try this" line under whichever lesson feels most connected to what you just wrote, and treat that as this week's actual assignment — not all 4 at once.
The practices from this edition
0 of 3 selected
Run this for seven days
Identify the mentee you've been quietly avoiding and reach out once this week with no agenda beyond checking in.