The Assertiveness Workbook
Leaders & Managers
DropRegion · Lessons from The Assertiveness Workbook · Randy J. Paterson

What Leaders and Managers Can Learn from The Assertiveness Workbook

Marcus managed a six-person engineering team, and one report, Talia, kept missing deadlines and presenting other people's work as her own in stand-ups. Instead of naming it, Marcus dropped hints — "let's make sure everyone gets credit next time" — that Talia never registered as directed at her. Month after month, his irritation built while his feedback stayed vague enough to change nothing. At her quarterly review, six months of unspoken grievances came out at once: missed deadlines, credit-taking, a tone he called "difficult," all delivered in a single flat monologue. Talia left the meeting in tears, blindsided by problems she'd never heard named. Within a week, the rest of the team had heard a version of what happened, and every one of them started reading his mild, hedged feedback as a warning sign of something bigger he wasn't saying yet.

01 · The Book in One Minute

The whole book, compressed

01Naming Your Style
02Making The Direct Ask
03Holding Your Ground When
04Practice Over Personality

This edition works through 4 core lessons — take them one at a time, not all at once.

02 · Where Are You Now?

What's different for your conditions

Tap whichever ones sound like you. Nothing here is sent or saved — it's just for your own noticing.

A manager's silence is not neutral the way a peer's might be; a report reads an unaddressed problem as tacit approval, so gaps between what you notice and what you say compound into a bigger mismatch than they would between equals.
Positional authority makes it easy to mistake volume or title for assertiveness, when a directive delivered from power without room for response is closer to the aggressive end of the spectrum than the direct one.
Delayed feedback accumulates interest: a small correction given promptly stays small, while the same correction held for months of quiet frustration arrives as an emotional overcorrection.
Everything a manager says or doesn't say becomes precedent that other reports watch and calibrate against, so one avoided conversation can quietly reset the whole team's norms.
A manager sits between pressure from above and expectations from below, which doubles the number of directions a request or refusal has to travel cleanly in the same week.

0 of 5 selected

03 · Core Lessons

The core lessons, applied to you

Naming Your Style

Naming Your Style in the Room

The idea

Most managers can describe their leadership philosophy in the abstract far more easily than they can describe how they actually behaved in yesterday's difficult conversation. The gap between the two is exactly where passivity and aggression hide, disguised as "keeping the peace" or "being direct."

What it looks like

Marcus believed he was "giving Talia room to self-correct," when the accurate description was that he avoided the conversation because he disliked confrontation.

Try this

After your next one-on-one that involved any tension, write one honest sentence describing what you actually did — avoided it, overcorrected, or said it plainly — before writing what you meant to do.

Making The Direct Ask

Making the Direct Ask in Feedback Conversations

The idea

A specific, direct request names the exact behavior and the exact change wanted, in one sentence, without stacking six months of grievances into a single ambush or softening the message until it disappears.

What it looks like

Marcus's review compressed half a year of unaddressed issues into one conversation, so Talia experienced normal course-correction as a sudden verdict on her whole performance.

Try this

The next time something needs correcting, say it within the same week in one sentence — the specific behavior and the specific change — rather than saving it for a scheduled review.

Holding Your Ground When

Holding Your Ground When a Report Pushes Back

The idea

Reports push back with justifications, comparisons to teammates, or wounded silence, and a manager's instinct is often to either retreat into vague reassurance or double down with a harsher line than the original point required.

What it looks like

When Talia protested that others made similar mistakes, Marcus either backed off the original point entirely or listed additional complaints to win the argument, instead of returning to the one issue at hand.

Try this

Prepare a single steady line — "that may be true, and this specific issue still needs to change" — and repeat it without adding new evidence each time it's tested.

Practice Over Personality

Practice Over Personality

The idea

Leaders often assume their management style is fixed by temperament, but directness under pressure is trainable through repetition, starting with low-stakes feedback before high-stakes reviews. If giving feedback triggers anxiety disproportionate to the actual risk — sleepless nights before routine one-on-ones, avoidance that damages team performance for months — that pattern is worth raising with a therapist or counselor rather than managing through willpower alone.

When the clusters compete

Naming a report's specific behavior directly can feel, to a manager worried about being liked, indistinguishable from being harsh — so directness gets diluted into vague hints that solve nothing. Holding your ground under pushback then requires exactly the plainness that got softened away earlier. The balance is to keep feedback small and frequent rather than saving it up, so no single conversation has to carry six months of unspoken correction at once.

04 · Choose Your Priority

Name one thing, honestly

Think of a report or peer you have been giving vague, hedged feedback to for months — what is the one specific sentence you have been avoiding saying to them?


Good. Now look back at the "Try this" line under whichever lesson feels most connected to what you just wrote, and treat that as this week's actual assignment — not all 4 at once.

05 · Put It Into Practice

The practices from this edition

After your next one-on-one that involved any tension, write one honest sentence describing what you actually did — avoided it, overcorrected, or said it plainly — before writing what you meant to do.
The next time something needs correcting, say it within the same week in one sentence — the specific behavior and the specific change — rather than saving it for a scheduled review.
Prepare a single steady line — "that may be true, and this specific issue still needs to change" — and repeat it without adding new evidence each time it's tested.

0 of 3 selected

06 · Small Experiment

Run this for seven days

Prepare a single steady line — "that may be true, and this specific issue still needs to change" — and repeat it without adding new evidence each time it's tested.

07 · Remember This
If you remember only 4 things
01Naming Your Style. Most managers can describe their leadership philosophy in the abstract far more easily than they can describe how they actually behaved in yesterday's difficult conversation.
02Making The Direct Ask. A specific, direct request names the exact behavior and the exact change wanted, in one sentence, without stacking six months of grievances into a single ambush or softening the message until it disappears.
03Holding Your Ground When. Reports push back with justifications, comparisons to teammates, or wounded silence, and a manager's instinct is often to either retreat into vague reassurance or double down with a harsher line than the original point required.
04Practice Over Personality. Leaders often assume their management style is fixed by temperament, but directness under pressure is trainable through repetition, starting with low-stakes feedback before high-stakes reviews.
08 · Your Next Step

What will you do differently because you read this?

Managers who want a structured way to build this skill deliberately, rather than relying on temperament, will find the underlying framework laid out fully in Randy J. Paterson's original workbook.