Learn it → Apply it → Save as Skill
We judge how common or likely something is by how easily examples come to mind, not by how often it actually happens. A vivid, recent, or emotional example can feel like proof of a pattern, even when the underlying numbers say otherwise.
The Dr. Wallace's Favorite Mental Models is designed to turn useful ways of thinking into reusable tools. Each model gives you a fast visual overview, deeper interactive learning, practical application exercises and an AI-ready Markdown skill you can save for future use.
Instead of merely reading about mental models, you can gradually build your own AI skills library: a collection of portable reasoning skills that can help ChatGPT, Claude, Grok and other AI assistants apply the mental models you value.
Memory is not a neutral record. Recent, dramatic, personally felt, or frequently repeated examples surface faster than routine ones, so we quietly treat "comes to mind easily" as a stand-in for "happens often."
Important: these two bars do not have to move together. A category can be highly memorable and low in frequency, or the reverse. The mismatch is the whole point.
The model is most useful whenever a fast intuitive sense of "how common" or "how likely" is about to guide a decision, a budget, or a fear.
The check is short, but skipping it is exactly how a single loud story quietly rewrites a decision.
Catch the moment you are judging how common, likely, or risky something is mostly from memory.
Ask why this example came to mind so easily: is it recent, dramatic, personally felt, or simply repeated often?
Look for the actual count, rate, or log behind the feeling, even a rough one.
Adjust the decision toward the evidence, without dismissing a genuinely new signal.
Open a use case to see what changes once you separate vividness from frequency.
A dramatic story about a competitor can make one risk feel urgent regardless of how likely it is here. Check your own incident history for that category before reallocating a budget around someone else's headline.
A vivid recent incident can make a specific hazard feel like the top risk even when a less dramatic hazard causes more harm over time. Compare incident logs across categories before rewriting the plan around one story.
A frightening story about a rare event can weigh far more in a decision than its real likelihood warrants. Look for the underlying rate before making a large change.
Students and teachers remember the questions that surprised or embarrassed them more than the routine ones, which can distort where study time goes. Check the actual exam blueprint or the past distribution of questions before reallocating time.
One dramatic support ticket or angry review can feel like proof of a widespread problem. Check ticket volume and severity across the whole user base before prioritizing a fix.
A recent crash or rally is far more vivid than years of steadier data, and it can distort a long-term plan. Return to the fuller historical range before adjusting a strategy.
This is an illustrative example designed to teach the method; the company and its figures are invented for teaching purposes.
Expand for the origin of the term and how it differs from nearby ideas.
Psychologists Amos Tversky and Daniel Kahneman introduced the availability heuristic in their 1973 paper "Availability: A Heuristic for Judging Frequency and Probability," published in the journal Cognitive Psychology. They showed that people often estimate how frequent or likely something is partly by how easily relevant examples come to mind, rather than by consulting actual rates.
No. Recency, something happened lately, is one common reason a memory feels available, but vividness, personal experience, emotional intensity, and repeated exposure can each make something feel available even when it is not recent.
A related but distinct idea from legal scholars Timur Kuran and Cass Sunstein, described in a 1999 paper: a self-reinforcing cycle in which repeated public or media discussion of an idea increases its perceived plausibility and urgency, independent of new evidence. It describes how availability spreads through a group, not only how one person's memory works.
Yes. The availability heuristic was part of the broader heuristics-and-biases research program that contributed to Daniel Kahneman's 2002 Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences. Amos Tversky, his principal collaborator on this work, had died in 1996; the Nobel Prize is not awarded posthumously.
One dramatic case is not a sample. Look for the underlying count or rate before acting on it.
Something can feel available because it is emotionally intense or personally close to you, not only because it happened recently.
The easiest number to picture is not always the most relevant one. Ask what the actual base rate is, even a rough one.
Rare and dramatic is not the same as common and consequential. Rank by real impact, not by how well you remember it.
Recalibrating toward data does not mean dismissing a genuinely new pattern. A vivid case can be an early signal worth watching even before it is the largest category.
When a story is repeated often, an availability cascade, the volume of repetition can feel like proof. Check the underlying source, not how many times you have heard it.
no comparable base rate exists yet and the vivid case is the only early warning of a genuinely new failure mode.
the potential consequence of a rare event is catastrophic and irreversible, regardless of its statistical frequency.
you are estimating your own past behavior or performance. Self-recall is especially unreliable and should be checked against a record, not just adjusted by feel.
This browser tool structures your thinking. It does not send your information anywhere or perform AI analysis.
Save as Skill converts the model into portable Markdown instructions that teach an AI when and how to apply the availability heuristic, what questions to ask, what evidence to seek, what mistakes to avoid, and how to structure its analysis.
Save the skills you find useful and organize them into your own reusable library. The Markdown is intentionally model-neutral, so it can be used wherever an AI system accepts uploaded files, project knowledge, custom instructions, or reusable text context. Platform capabilities differ, so this is a portable skill file rather than a claim of one-click installation.
Not necessarily in one direction. The heuristic can also make something feel less likely than it is when good examples are simply hard to recall, for instance a slow-building problem with no single dramatic moment attached to it. The distortion runs in whichever direction memory happens to be easiest.
Representativeness, another heuristic described by Tversky and Kahneman, judges likelihood by how much something resembles a typical case or stereotype. Availability judges likelihood by how easily examples come to mind. The two often overlap in a real judgment, but they are separate mechanisms.
Yes. Repetition, vivid imagery, and emotionally charged framing are well documented ways that media coverage, marketing, and persuasion can raise the availability of a claim without adding any new evidence for it. Noticing repetition itself is a useful check.