Companion format F2 · Quadrants: Know Thyself
Two people, one framework, side by side. The interesting result is almost never either score. It is the distance between them.
Most disagreements that keep coming back are not disagreements about the thing being discussed. They are two people running different settings on the same dial and each assuming the other is being difficult on purpose.
This page takes two result codes from the same framework and puts them next to each other. It shows where the two of you agree, where you differ, how big the difference is, and which individual statements you answered furthest apart. That last list is usually the most useful thing on the page, because a specific sentence is much easier to talk about than a general sense that something is off.
Names are optional and stay in this browser tab. Nothing is saved and nothing is sent anywhere.
| Dimension | Difference |
|---|
Ranked by the size of the gap. A gap of three or four points on a five point scale usually means the two of you are describing genuinely different experiences, not just wording it differently.
| Statement | Gap |
|---|
Drawn from the statements above. Ask them as questions, not as evidence.
A comparison like this is useful when both people want to understand each other better. It is not useful, and can do real harm, when it is used to settle an argument, to prove a point, or to tell someone what they are like. Neither column is the correct one. The gap is information about the pair, not a score for either person.